Saturday, September 28, 2019

To kill a Mockingbird


I know what the book is about since I had already seen the movie starring Gregory Peck but for some reason I always thought that I would probably not like the book itself if I ever got to read it.
I am happy to declare that I was completely wrong.
Another book which I have always felt that I would not like is “Uncle Tom’s Cabin”. Again, I have seen movies and dramas based on it so I know what that one is about as well.
Why did i think like that?
Maybe because both books deal with issues specific to American History and not being an American myself, I did not feel connected to them or drawn to them in anyway. But then again reading about cultures and traditions totally unrelated and separate from my own has never posed any problems for me before.
Or maybe it was because I generally do not favour books that are inclined portray the tragic or depressive side of life. Regardless, I have read a few of those as well and also liked some.
So what was it that kept me from reading them all these year? I am not sure I know.
All I know is that having been proven wrong about one, I am willing to be pleasantly proven wrong about the other as well. 

Sunday, September 22, 2019

The desecration of a book


The problem with readers like myself is that in our eagerness to share our reading experiences with others we readily lend our books to them. I have learnt through experience, painful ones, I might add, not to lend books to teenagers. They have a tendency to treat them pretty much the same way they treat everything else in life: with extreme carelessness.
If my comment has come across as if I am stereotyping all teenagers, then I apologize for it but refuse to take it back. Like I said I have had some pretty painful experiences in this area. One classic, “Great Expectations” was borrowed by a much younger cousin for his English class in school. That was the last I saw of it. Since it has been nearly fifteen years since the date of borrowing, I can safely say that the chances of it ever being returned are next to nil.   My only consolation is that it was a mere paper back, though I do wish that someone in my cousin’s English class along with discussing the eccentricities of Miss Havisham would also have taught him the difference between “borrowing” and “Keeping”.
Well, I guess that is water under the bridge now.
A more recent “borrowing” was of the Elif Shafaq Novel, “Forty Rules of Love”. Determined not to wait another 15 years to lament the loss of my book, I asked for this one back somewhere within a one year period. After some reluctance the book was handed back to me and I was happy to have it back. It wasn’t until a few days later as I flipped through the pages of the book did I realize what kind of torture it had been put under.
About nearly one third of the book (I am guessing that is about as much as my young reader managed to read in that one year period) was underlined with markers. Apparently the book had been used as an English learning tool by underlining the difficult words.
I am not in the habit of turning the corner of the page when I put a book down. I always remember where I had left off, no matter after however many days I get a chance to go back to whatever I was reading. To someone like me, even turning the corner to mark the page in a book is a sign of disrespect. To have a book of mine violated in such a way nearly made me want to weep. Admittedly this was another paper back but that is no reason to subject it to such brutal treatment.
Though nowhere in the same league as Elif Shafaq’s Forty Rules of Love, I too have developed a couple of my own rules for lending books.

  • ·         If possible never lend books to teenagers. if it cannot be avoided out of courtesy then the lending should be accompanied by full set of instructions on how to treat the book. (wouldn’t be a bad idea to give the instructions to anyone who borrows and not just teenagers)
  • ·         No book should be lent beyond a two month period. Anyone who has not managed to finish the borrowed material in the aforementioned period is unlikely to do so ever so one might as well ask for it back.
That reminds me.
My assistant borrowed a hard back copy of William Dalrymple’s “The last Moghul Emperor” and his two month period has already expired. Time to get that one back from him.